Self Defense

Self-Defense as a Probable Defense

The plea of self-defense is commonly recognized in U.S. criminal law. It ensures that individuals are not wrongfully punished for defending themselves from imminent danger. The probable defense of self-balances the right of the defendant’s personal safety with the court’s need to keep law and order.’

Keep reading to explore what the plea of self-defense entails, as well as four relevant applicable related legal concepts: the Stand Your Ground Law, the Castle Doctrine, the No Duty to Retreat and The Duty to Retreat.

What is Self-Defense?

Self-defense allows individuals to use force to protect themselves from physical harm when they believe they are in immediate danger. It doesn’t give you the right to attack someone at will; it is limited to use in situations where you are faced with a real and imminent threat.

Self-defense laws vary slightly by state, but most follow similar basic principles. To successfully claim self-defense, a defendant generally needs to prove one of the following:

1. Imminent Threat: The person was facing with an immediate threat of harm. The danger was real, not a future or hypothetical threat.
2. Proportional Force: The force used in self-defense must be proportional to the threat faced. For example, using deadly force may be justified if facing a lethal threat, but it would not be justified if the threat was minor or non-life-threatening.
3. Reasonable Belief: The person must have truly believed that they were in danger and needed to defend themselves. It must be established that the fear would be reasonable from the standpoint of any ordinary person in the same circumstances.
4. Duty to Retreat (in Some States): Some states have a “duty to retreat” rule, meaning a person must try to avoid the danger by retreating, if possible, before using force in self-defense. However, many states have adopted “Stand Your Ground” laws, which allow individuals to use force without retreating when faced with an immediate threat.

How Self-Defense Works in Court

In criminal cases, self-defense is raised by your lawyer as an affirmative defense. This means that the defendant admits to the conduct they’re accused of, such as assault or even homicide, but argues that their actions were legally justified in the name of self-protection.

Evidence that that they were under threat and therefore acted reasonably under the circumstances must be presented. Evidence could include witness testimony, security camera footage, or medical details. This shifts the burden of proof to the prosecution to show that the defendant’s actions were not justified.

Three Key Concepts: “Stand Your Ground”, “Castle Doctrine” and “Duty to Retreat Policy”

Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws enable individuals to use physical force as self-defense, but they differ in scope. Duty of Retreat is the encouragement of the law to leave the situation, and not engage in retaliation.

The Castle Doctrine applies specifically to situations occurring in one’s home or other legally occupied spaces like vehicles. It gives one the right to defend oneself without retreating within a personal dwelling or property.

Stand Your Ground extends this principle to any location where a person has a legal right to be, including public places, such as at a park or parking lot. Stand Your Ground laws do not limit the right to self-defense to one’s home, whereas the Castle Doctrine is rooted in the sanctity of the home.

In states with Stand Your Ground laws, individuals are not required to retreat from a threat before using force, even in public places. This means if someone is confronted with an immediate threat, they can defend themselves without trying to run away first.

Note that California does not have a specific Stand Your Ground law like some other states, but a No Duty to Retreat policy that follows a similar principle of self-defense as Stand Your Ground.

No Duty to Retreat policy is the opposite of Duty to Retreat practiced in many states that says a threatened person cannot harm an oppressor, especially if the victim has the possibility of retreat.

The complexity of the Californian “no duty to retreat policy’ is why you need to a hire California-based attorney Nate Crowley to handle your case. Your legal counsel may argue that in a life-threatening confrontation, individuals may not have the time or clarity of thought to assess whether retreat is possible or safe. A retreat could expose the person to greater risk in some cases, especially if the attacker pursues them.

Key Elements of Stand Your Ground Laws

Stand Your Ground Laws emphasize the right to self-defense, particularly in public spaces.

1. No Duty to Retreat: Under Stand Your Ground laws, a person does not have a legal obligation to attempt to retreat or escape from the threatening situation, even when they are outside their home or in a public place. This is opposite to the idea that individuals must attempt to retreat if they can safely do so before using deadly force.
2. Reasonable Belief of Imminent Threat: For the use of force to be justified under Stand Your Ground laws, the person must have a reasonable belief that they are facing an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. The threat must be real and immediate, not speculative or hypothetical.
3. Lawful Presence: The individual must be in a place where they are lawfully permitted to be. For example, if someone is at home, in their vehicle, or in a public space where they have the legal right to be, Stand Your Ground laws applies.
4. Use of Force, Including Deadly Force: Stand Your Ground laws permit the use of force, including deadly force, in response to an imminent threat. However, the level of force used must be proportionate to the threat. Deadly force is generally permissible only when the individual reasonably believes they are in danger of serious injury or death.

If someone uses force under a Stand Your Ground law, they can invoke this law as a defense if criminal charges are filed. If successful, the defense can lead to the dismissal of charges or an acquittal. However, the success of a Stand Your Ground defense depends on whether or not the use of force was reasonable.

Key Elements of the Castle Doctrine

Many U.S. states have enacted some version of the Castle Doctrine into their legal codes, though the details vary from state to state. In Texas and Florida, for example, the Castle Doctrine also extends beyond the home to include vehicles and places of business.

1. No Duty to Retreat in One’s Home: Essentially, “your home is your castle,” and you have the right to defend yourself with force, including deadly force, against an intruder without any obligation to flee. if they can safely do so, the Castle Doctrine explicitly removes this duty when inside one’s residence.
2. Reasonable Belief of Imminent Harm: The use of force under the Castle Doctrine is justified only if the person reasonably believes that the intruder poses an imminent threat of harm, such as physical injury or death, to themselves or others in the home. The belief must be reasonable based on the circumstances at the time.
3. Use of Deadly Force: The doctrine allows for the use of deadly force if the homeowner believes it is necessary to prevent serious bodily harm or death. Some jurisdictions also extend this protection to the defense of property when the intruder is committing or attempting to commit a felony within the home.
4. Lawful Occupancy: The Castle Doctrine applies to individuals who are lawfully present in the residence or property at the time of the intrusion. If someone is unlawfully occupying the space (e.g., trespassing), they may not be able to invoke the doctrine to justify the use of force.

Some states further reinforce the Castle Doctrine by creating a presumption that a person who unlawfully enters another’s home is there to cause harm, which makes it easier for homeowners to justify the use of force.

What is the Duty to Retreat?

The duty to retreat is a law that requires a person to avoid using deadly force, if possible, by retreating or escaping the situation before resorting to violence. The idea behind this doctrine is to encourage people to de-escalate or avoid confrontations, rather than immediately using force to defend themselves.

The duty to retreat is part of the legal framework in some U.S. states, particularly in cases involving deadly force. This concept plays a significant role in balancing the right to self-defense with the responsibility to avoid unnecessary violence.

Key Elements of the Duty to Retreat

1. Opportunity to Safely Retreat: The duty to retreat only applies when the person has a safe and reasonable opportunity to do so. If retreating would place the person in more danger, the duty does not apply. For example, if someone is cornered and cannot escape without risking serious harm, they are not required to retreat.
2. Use of Deadly Force: A person must attempt to retreat if they can safely do so before using deadly force to protect themselves from an attacker.
3. Reasonable Belief: If a person reasonably believes they cannot safely retreat or that fleeing would put them at greater risk, they are justified in using force to defend themselves.
4. No Duty to Retreat from Non-Deadly Threats: The duty to retreat usually does not apply to situations where non-deadly force is used in self-defense. For example, if someone is being threatened but the threat is not life-threatening, they may use proportionate force before retreating.

In the U.S., the duty to retreat is not a universal rule, and its application varies from state to state. Some states follow the traditional duty to retreat doctrine, while others have modified or eliminated it through Stand Your Ground laws.

California’s No Duty to Retreat Law

While California does not have a formal Stand Your Ground statute, its self-defense laws function similarly by removing the duty to retreat. However, unlike some states with explicit Stand Your Ground laws, California courts still look closely at whether the use of force was reasonable in each specific case. This means that while retreat is not required, the use of force must be justified based on the circumstances.

In California, juries will consider whether a person’s actions were reasonable and necessary to prevent harm. The reasonableness of the defendant’s belief that they were in danger is key to determining if the self-defense claim will succeed.

Limits to Self-Defense

While self-defense is a powerful legal defense, it has limits. It cannot be used in situations where the force used was excessive to the threat faced. For example, responding to a slap with deadly force would not likely be considered reasonable.

Additionally, self-defense cannot be claimed by someone who initiated the violence or was the aggressor, except in rare cases where the aggressor attempts to withdraw from the conflict and is then attacked.

Self-defense is a fundamental right in the U.S. legal system, offering individuals the ability to protect themselves when faced with imminent danger. However, it is not a free pass for violent behavior. The force used must be reasonable and proportional to the threat, and in some cases, retreating might have been required.

If you find yourself facing criminal charges but acted in self-defense, it’s crucial to consult with California federal defense attorney Nate Crowley who can help you navigate the complexities of the law and ensure that your rights are fully protected.

Is Self-Defence Your Possible Defence?

Contact California-based criminal defense lawyer Nate Crowley to handle the intricacies of your case!

Fill out our contact form on the Home Page https://www.natecrowleylaw.com/
Phone (619) 202-8188 OR email admin@crowleycrowleylaw.com