10+ YEARS CRIMINAL LAW PRACTICE,
THOUSANDS OF CASES HANDLED
SUCCESSFULLY
The term “material support to terrorists” is a legal concept that signifies assistance provided to foreign terrorist organizations or individuals engaged in terrorism-related activities. Codified under 18 U.S.C. § 2339A and 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, the prohibition against providing material support seeks to cut off resources that could enable terrorist operations, even if the supporter is not directly involved in or aware of specific terrorist acts.
Material support is broadly defined and includes a wide range of resources. The statute enumerates specific types of support, such as funding, training, expert advice, safe houses, false documentation, weapons, and other tangible resources. Additionally, the concept encompasses intangible services such as training and technical support, which may enhance a terrorist organization’s operational capability.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, it is illegal to provide material support to designated foreign terrorist organizations without requiring proof that the provider intended to further any specific terrorist action. This sweeping prohibition aims to prevent individuals and entities from contributing, even unintentionally, to the infrastructure of terrorism.
The penalties for providing material support to terrorists are severe, which is why you need an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer Nate Crowley to reflect the seriousness with which federal law views this crime.
Convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 2339A or § 2339B carry potential prison sentences of up to 20 years. If the material support provided is connected to a conspiracy that results in death, the offense may be punishable by life imprisonment. Fines may also be imposed alongside or instead of imprisonment. The financial penalties can reach up to $250,000 per offense, or higher, depending on the organization’s involvement.
Defending against allegations of providing material support to terrorists in California involves complex legal and constitutional challenges. The federal statute under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B criminalizes providing resources, training, or aid to designated foreign terrorist organizations, even when intended for lawful purposes such as humanitarian aid.
Legal defense strategies often focus on First Amendment protections, particularly regarding free speech and association. A key argument is whether the defendant knowingly and intentionally supported illegal activities. Defense counsel may challenge the government’s evidence, such as surveillance or financial records, and raise issues of entrapment, prosecutorial overreach, or improper designation of organizations.
Prosecuting individuals under the material support statutes can raise challenging constitutional issues, particularly concerning the First Amendment’s protections on freedom of speech and association. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the statutes against challenges, as in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (2010), which found that the government may criminalize certain support without violating free speech rights.
Both the federal government and the State of California carry strict penalties intended to deter individuals and entities from assisting or enabling terrorist activities. Nate Crowley is a criminal defense lawyer based in California balancing these prohibitions against constitutional rights to mitigate these charges.
Fill out our contact form on the Home Page https://www.natecrowleylaw.com/
Phone (619) 202-8188 OR email admin@crowleycrowleylaw.com